SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES OF DEGREE OF ADJECTIVE IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK LANGUAGES

Authors

  • Teacher of Navoi state Pedagogical institute English Language and Literature faculty Sharipova Bahora Odiljonovna Student of English language and literature faculty Ubaydullayeva Nazokatxon

Abstract

This article examines the parallels and differences in the degree of adjectives in English and Uzbek languages. Adjectives are crucial linguistic tools for conveying attributes and making comparisons in both languages. While both English and Uzbek use inflectional methods to indicate positive, comparative, and superlative degrees, they follow different patterns and usage standards. In English, comparative and superlative degrees are frequently produced with suffixes or auxiliary words, but Uzbek use suffixes and unique auxiliary words. Despite these changes, adjectives' essential role in refining descriptions and communicating subtle meanings is identical throughout both languages. This comparative research offers insight on the complex interplay between linguistic structures and cultural settings, emphasizing the dynamic aspect of language change. Examining the degree of adjectives in English and Uzbek provides useful insights into language variation as well as how languages create and reflect cultural norms and values. Understanding these parallels and contrasts not only enhances our appreciation for language complexity, but it also promotes crosscultural understanding and communication.

Keywords: Adjectives, degree of comparison, English language, Uzbek language, comparative analysis, linguistic diversity.

References

Eissenberg J. Comparative Studies in Uzbek Syntax: The Case of the Q-Particle. – Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1993. – 240 p.

Hopper P.J., Traugott E.C. Grammaticalization. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. – 376 p.

Kortmann B., Schneider E.W. A Handbook of Varieties of English: Morphology and Syntax. – Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2004. – 1056 p.

Larsen-Freeman D. Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching. – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. – 435 p.

Matthews P.H. The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Linguistics. – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. – 472 p.

Quirk R., Greenbaum S., Leech G., Svartvik J. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. – London: Longman, 1985. – 1779 p.

Ruzmetov J. Uzbek-English Dictionary. – Tashkent: Goslitizdat, 1979. – 830 p.

Swan M. Practical English Usage. – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. – 690 p.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-15